Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Redefining Education

My grad class has asked this question: "Has technology redefined education?"

The answer is a no-brainer, and has always been true- YES!

Much of this stems from this article written in the New York Times last October.  The article more or less suggests that education doesn't need to be using technology because it works at the Waldorf school.    Malarky.  These students are children of highly-paid employees of Silicon Valley giants like Google.  These kids have DNA that helps them, as well as families who value education.  That's a great start to being successful.  It doesn't hurt that the staff at Waldorf features a majority of teachers who have spent time overseas and in other professions.  That experience makes them fascinating people that are interesting- great qualities for teachers.  Plus, the teachers "loop" with their students from Kindergarten through eighth grade!  I can tell you that the advantages of knowing your students that well and for so long are many.  It's not the lack of technology that makes this school better, it's clearly the people.

Back to the question.  Before the printing press, (this is a lot of history for me, I'm not much into the past) one would learn as an apprentice.  They would learn from working directly with the person doing the job they would one day be doing themselves.  A blacksmith's apprentice would learn all of the smithing techniques from the blacksmith, and once he was capable he would become a blacksmith.  After the printing press, this didn't change that much.  At least not at first.  Rich people could afford books (they were cheaper than handwritten books, but they weren't free or anything!) and there was a "Digital Divide."  Ok, a "Technology Divide", but it's not as fun to say.  So now some people learned from books, not necessarily people.  As the Industrial Revolution changed the way humans worked, it also changed education.  Too many kids were jobless!  (Seriously, child labor laws came to be and kids didn't need to work as much as before to help their families survive.)  Schools started giving basic educations to everyone!  Plus, they were kind enough to let everyone out during the summer so they could do the farming.  Twice, through books and then machines, education was redefined.  So what's happening now?

It's all about jobs.  We are well past apprentice jobs, which were really simple to train for.  It was a "sitting duck".  Now we are aiming at a "moving target."  According to a study last year, technology companies have employees with a median age of 36.  According to this study the first social networking site began in 1997, when the average technology employee was 21 years old and likely in college.  That means that even while they were in college, their jobs may have not existed!  Technology  is changing the work force so rapidly that we no longer know exactly what we are aiming for.

Technology has always redefined education.  We are now aiming at a moving target.


I should add (and I have to for my grad class :-) ) that we took notes collaboratively.  Here is the link to my group's notes.  Truthfully I didn't really dig the joint notes.  I felt much of it was redundant and notes are often strange to read when someone else wrote them.  We tend to write small fragments with little context and often only write what is new or unknown to us.  These tendencies make others' notes quite strange to read. 

 

10 comments:

  1. I am grateful that you included the historical perspective to this argument. I often find myself wondering if the changes that are happening are neither good nor bad, but just the same shifts in direction that have been happening over the course of human history. My colleagues and I have been discussing whether to have the kids make hand written graphs versus create them on exel. On one side we want to have the kids make them for the practice, but on the other hand knowing Exel is a much more valuable skill in our society. As I have been observing this dialogue between my colleagues one teacher raises the point that the kids should know how to find and calculate the slope of a line to verify results in a physics lab. The other teacher responded that none of us know how to use a slide rule and that has seemed to work out for us. Change can be a little frightening especially to us who have some deep rooted ideas about what kids should know, but in the end, not knowing how to use a slide rule must have been a terrifying idea to many people in the past, and today we seem to be getting along just fine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love this dialogue between you and your colleagues. I can imagine the same things going on in our conversations at my school. Being a member of a fraternity in college actually changed my whole view on keeping things around based on "tradition". Hazing is "tradition" and it is terrible. I would say the same thing could be said about antiquated skills like using a slide ruler or abacas. That opens a GIANT conversation though, doesn't it? What skills are no longer necessary but we keep teaching them based on tradition? Good insight!

      Delete
  2. I enjoyed how you included the history of this argument. It really made ponder if things really have changed. For instance, when I was in my undergraduate studies, I learned about my career from wiring with a mentor during my internships or student teaching. Many college students today have to have an internship prior before receiving a job position within a company. Many companies want employees that already have work experience before hiring. The child labor laws have changed, but the idea of having prior work experience has not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very true! It's that common problem- employers want people with experience, but people can't get the experience without the job. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."

      Delete
  3. You should embed your collaborative notes to this post! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. First, I'm glad to see that I am not the only one who had a strong reaction to the Waldorf Way and holding that system up as an argument for not needing technology in school. That system is successful for sooooooo many other reasons

    Secondly, as the other commentors also said, bringing in the historical work aspect did help make your point. We have to prepare students today for the jobs of today and the future. The key is making learning these technologies fun. It's kind of hard getting a point across to a 10 year old that you are trying to prepare then for a "job" that 10 years down the road. They need a motivating reason to learn the technology now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Andrew,

    I loved your thought process on technology, especially the part about technology being a moving target. I also agree with your thought on the note taking, I did enjoy reading the other thoughts but it did feel ( as you said) that it was redundant.

    carol

    ReplyDelete